Cyberpunk 2077 v 2.0- PC performance graphics benchmarks of old Graphics Cards and Processors
| BASIC GAME INFORMATION |
In this review we will look at Cyberpunk 2077 v 2.0 on older families of NVIDIA and AMD video cards with all graphics quality settings. We will analyze the performance of these video cards and find out which solution handles the game better.
| IRON IN TESTS |
The company kindly helped us with all possible support in expanding the test stand for this type of testing GIGABYTE .
| THE GRAFICAL PART |
This subsection of our review highlights the main graphical aspects of this game. Particular attention is paid to the version of the graphics engine used, the version of the API used, graphic settings and the quality of development of the main visual aspects.
| SUPPORTED OS AND GRAPHICS API |
Cyberpunk 2077 v 2.0 supported Windows10/11.
Priority and main graphics API for Cyberpunk 2077 v 2.0 is DX11/12.
| Patch v 2.0 |
With the new Cyberpunk 2.0 update, many aspects of the game have been revised and improved. Skill trees and perks now offer deeper and more varied character development. These changes will allow players to better adapt to their playstyle and strategy, making each experience unique.
Updated cybernetic support and a new capacity system expand the possibilities of character customization and improvement. With the new Cyber Upgrade system, players can now "overload" their Augments, increasing their effectiveness, but at the risk of experiencing side effects.
As for vehicles, the game now provides the opportunity not only to ride cars and motorcycles, but also to interact with them while driving. For example, V can shoot from a window or control a built-in turret. In addition, players will find new car chases in the open world, which adds more dynamics.
In the combat section, the game becomes less predictable. Previously, enemies acted according to a simple and monotonous pattern, but now their artificial intelligence has been improved. They became smarter, using cover and using new melee skills.
Finally, changes to the loot and crafting system make the process of collecting and creating items more interesting and varied. Players can find new types of weapons, clothing and other items, as well as use updated mechanics to create unique equipment.
In addition to the already listed improvements in Update 2.0, it is important to note the improvements in the graphical part of the game. Path tracing mode, which previously required significant resources and computer power, has now been significantly increased in performance. This allows players with weaker hardware to enjoy high quality graphics without losing FPS, making the gameplay much smoother.
Comparing with release version 1.03, Cyberpunk 2077 has come a long way. Version 1.03, despite its ambition, faced many problems: bugs, performance problems, graphical errors and lack of certain functionality. Players encountered gameplay interruptions, unexpected crashes, and other problems.
Since release, the developers have put a lot of effort into fixing these issues. Update 2.0 was the culmination of these efforts, introducing not only bug fixes, but also many new features and improvements that make the game much deeper, more interesting and more stable. Today Cyberpunk 2077 is a much more polished and streamlined product than the original release.
| TEST PART |
| GPU TEST |
In the video card test, the default resolution is 1920x1080; other resolutions are added and removed manually. You can also remove and add any positions of video cards. You can also select any of our test processors from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the given video card tests (by default, the most productive solution is selected). The test is carried out on the most powerful CPU in this game and is scaled to other processors, taking into account their testing on NVIDIA and AMD video cards.
- Low v. 1.63
- Low v. 2.0
- Ultra v 1.63
- Ultra v 2.0
Low 1.63
When resolved 1920x1080 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5600 XT or GeForce GTX 1070 Ti.
When resolved 2560x1440 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 570 or GeForce GTX 1060. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5700 XT .
When resolved 3840x2160 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1080. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1080 FSR.
Impressive 1.63
When resolved 1920x1080 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 580 or GeForce GTX 1060 FSR. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce GTX 1070. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5700 XT FSR.
When resolved 2560x1440 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1070 FSR. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1070 FSR.
Low 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5600 XT or GeForce GTX 1070 Ti.
When resolved 2560x1440 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 470 or GeForce GTX 1060. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 570 or GeForce GTX 1060. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5700 XT or GeForce GTX 1070 Ti FSR.
When resolved 3840x2160 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1080.
Impressive 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX 580 or GeForce GTX 1060 FSR. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce GTX 1070. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 5700 XT FSR.
When resolved 2560x1440 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1070 FSR. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 FSR or GeForce GTX 1070 FSR.
| VIDEO MEMORY CONSUMPTION |
Testing of video memory consumed by the game was carried out by the program MSI Afterburner. The indicator was based on the results on video cards from AMD and NVIDIA with separate screen sizes 1920x1080, 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 with various anti-aliasing settings. By default, the graph displays the most current solutions. Other video cards are added and removed from the chart at the request of the reader.
- Low v. 1.63
- Low v. 2.0
- Ultra v 1.63
- Ultra v 2.0
GameGPU
Low 1.63
When resolved 1920x1080 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte.
Impressive 1.63When resolved 1920x1080 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 7 gigabyte.
Low 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 3 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 3 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 4 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte.
Impressive 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 5 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 video memory consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 6 gigabyte.
| CPU TEST |
Testing was carried out at a resolution of 1920x1080. In the processor test, you can remove or add any processor positions. You can also select any tested video card from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the given processor test results (by default, the most productive solution from NVIDIA is selected). Testing takes place on the most powerful NVIDIA and AMD video cards and scales to low-end models.
- Low v. 1.63
- Low v. 2.0
- Ultra v 1.63
- Ultra v 2.0
Low 1.63
When using video cards NVIDIA processors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 2100, and an FPS of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions at the level Core i 7 5960X.
When using video cards AMDprocessors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 2100, and an FPS of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions at the level Core i 7 5960X.
Impressive 1.63When using video cards NVIDIA processors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 4330.
When using video cards AMDprocessors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 4330.
Low 2.0
When using video cards NVIDIA processors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 2100, and an FPS of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions at the level Ryzen 7 2700 or Core i 7 5960X.
When using video cards AMDprocessors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 3 2100, and an FPS of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions at the level Core i 7 5960X.
Impressive 2.0
When using video cards NVIDIA processors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 5 2500.
When using video cards AMDprocessors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 5 2500.
- Ultra v 1.63
- Ultra v 2.0
The game can load up to 16 streams. The game uses 12 threads as efficiently as possible.
| RAM TEST |
The test was carried out on the basic configuration of the Core i 7 5960X with 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz pre-installed memory. All used RAM was taken as an indicator. The RAM test on the entire system was carried out on various video cards without launching third-party applications (browsers, etc.). In the graphics, you can add and remove any resolutions and video cards as desired.
- Low v. 1.63
- Low v. 2.0
- Ultra v 1.63
- Ultra v 2.0
GameGPU
Low 1.63
When resolved 1920x1080 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
Impressive 1.63
When resolved 1920x1080 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 8 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 12 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 13 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 9 gigabyte.
Low 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
Impressive 2.0
When resolved 1920x1080 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560x1440 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840x2160 RAM consumption for video cards with 6-yu gigabytes will be 12 gigabyte, 8-yu gigabytes will be 10 gigabyte.
| Тeating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 78% [5 vote(s)] | Graphics 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 78% [5 vote(s)] | Optimization 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 50% [4 vote(s)] |
Join us on social networks!
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |