tg Facebook insta link redit twiter jute  patreon
 
train

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 - PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors

BASIC INFORMATION ON THE GAME

code 2022 11 16 22 47 20 969

Release date:November 16, 2022
developer: Infinity Ward
Genre: Action, Visual Novel

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 is a battle royale video game released on November 16, 2022 for PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One, Windows and Xbox Series X/S.

This is the sequel to 2020 Call of Duty: Warzone. The game is part of Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II 2022 but does not require the purchase of the aforementioned game. The game features cross-platform play and a new extraction mode called DMZ.

NEW IN TESTS - GEFORCE RTX 4090 / Core i9 13900KF

 

Our test now includes Palit Gamerock GEFORCE RTX 4090 24 GB, kindly provided to us by the company telemart. This video card is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, operates at a frequency of 2500 MHz, has 16384 stream processors and 24 gigabytes of video memory.

20221115 123404 20221115 123628 20221115 125137

Our test now includes GBGIGABYTE GEFORCE RTX 4090 24GB, kindly provided to us by the company GIGABYTE.

20221021 192543  20221021 192823 20221021 192856 20221031 185824 1

Our test now includes ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 OC Edition, kindly provided to us by the company ARTLINE. This video card is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, operates at a frequency of 2600 MHz, has 16384 stream processors and 24 gigabytes of video memory.

Also participating in our test Intel Core i9-13900KF, kindly provided to us by the company ARTLINE. At the moment, the top gaming processor in the Intel line.

THE GRAFICAL PART

In this subsection of our review, the main graphical aspects of this game are revealed. Particular attention is paid to the version of the graphics engine used, the version of the API used, graphics settings and the quality of the development of the main visual aspects. 

SUPPORTED OC AND GRAPHICS API

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 supported  Windows 10/11.

steam
 

The priority and primary graphics API for Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 is DX12.

GAME ENGINE

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 was developed based on the IW engine 8. In 2002, the 3D shooter Medal of Honor: Allied Assault was released - one of the games in the Medal of Honor series, which takes place during World War II. This game used the id Tech 3 game engine (then known as the Quake 2015 Engine, after the name of the first game where it was used) by id Software as a technological base. Allied Assault was developed by the studio XNUMX, Inc., some of whose employees left the company after the release of the game to found Infinity Ward.

Infinity Ward's first game was 2003's Call of Duty, which, like Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, is set in World War II. This game is also built on the id Tech 3 engine. The choice of this technology is obviously due to the fact that Infinity Ward employees already had experience with it. Compared to the original id Tech 3, the graphics component of the engine has undergone a number of changes. So, the game began to actively use post-effects (for example, “image blur”), water is processed using shaders, which made it possible to make realistic reflections, the lighting system was complicated and dynamic soft shadows appeared. Subsequently, an official addon was also released for Call of Duty - Call of Duty: United Offensive.

Call of Duty 2 3


This diagram illustrates the history of the development of game engines of the IW Engine series On October 25, 2005, Call of Duty 2, developed by Infinity Ward, was released, which is a full-fledged continuation of the first part. Call of Duty 2 is considered the first game on the IW engine. Technically, this engine is a heavily revised id Tech 3, an evolution of the engine that was used in the very first part.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4

Compared to the original engine, this version has many improvements and changes: instead of the OpenGL API, the image is processed by Direct3D, several bump mapping techniques are applied, shadow processing is more complicated, the particle system and post-effects are significantly improved. The next game based on the IW engine was Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare in 2007. This game uses the third version of the engine (IW engine 3.0); the technology was once again refined and improved: facial animation, water surface processing, lighting effects were complicated, new post-effects appeared, such as depth of field, color correction of the image is widely used to give it a special stylization.

Call of Duty World at War

In 2008, the fifth part of the series of games was released - Call of Duty: World at War (developer: Treyarch). The game is built on the third version of the engine (IW engine 3.0), which was upgraded by Treyarch developers. Another Treyarch game, Quantum of Solace: The Game, was made on the same version of the engine. In 2009, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 was released (development again passed to Infinity Ward). This game uses the next version of the engine, IW engine 4.0, with a number of improvements, including Streaming Textures technology (streaming texture loading).

November 9, 2010 was the release of the seventh part of Call of Duty - Black Ops. This game uses a significantly improved version of the IW engine 3.0 that was used in Call of Duty: World at War, which is likely due to the fact that the development of the game was started in parallel with the creation of Modern Warfare 2. Compared to previous parts of the game, the graphics code was several major improvements have been made, including, among other things, a completely redesigned lighting system and improved particle system performance.

Call of Duty Black Ops

In the same year, GoldenEye 007, the “spiritual successor” to the original 007 GoldenEye 1997 for the Nintendo 64, was released on the Wii console. Eurocom was responsible for the development, and Activision was engaged in publishing. This game, according to some sources, also uses an internal modification of the IW engine (the exact version is unknown).

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3

On November 8, 2011, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 was released, based on an updated version of the IW 4.0 engine (working title is MW3 Engine); Infinity Ward, Sledgehammer Games and Raven Software were responsible for development. In October, Glen Schofield, founder of Sledgehammer Games, stated in an interview that the IW engine resembles a Porsche, and that criticisms of the engine made in reviews of Modern Warfare 3 are unfounded, as the developers are constantly modifying and reworking the technology.

Call of Duty Black Ops 2

On May 1, 2012, the ninth game in the series and the 2010 sequel to Call of Duty: Black Ops, Call of Duty: Black Ops II, was announced. The game uses an updated version of the IW 3.0 engine used to create the first part of Black Ops. HDR lighting, self-shadowing, bounce lighting and reveal mapping were added to the engine, and the PC version of the game had DirectX 11 support. According to Treyarch, 60 frames per second (FPS) on any platform is a top priority for them. The game was released on November 13, 2012.

blackops3 1

Call of Duty: Ghosts was released in 2013. This game was developed by Infinity Ward with the participation of Raven Software and Neversoft Entertainment. At the announcement, the game engine was described by representatives of the publishing house as "completely new", but later the developers clarified that the engine is a development of their own engine - IW 6.0; for example, the studio's animator, Zach Walker, said: “It's impossible to develop a new game engine from scratch in the two-year cycle that our games go through. We act differently - we conduct research and draw conclusions about which systems and main parts of the engine are obsolete and update them, bringing them to the modern level. How much do we update them? I think enough to afford to call this engine new.

SETTINGS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 has a fairly wide range of graphics settings.

code 2022 11 16 22 47 24 946 code 2022 11 16 22 47 27 949

Below we have provided screenshots of the game at various graphics settings, where our readers can see the difference between the minimum and maximum graphics quality settings.

QUALITY MODES

TECHNOLOGIES

The graphics in the game are similar to the single-player Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2:

code 2022 11 16 20 54 39 745 code 2022 11 16 20 56 39 643

code 2022 11 16 21 05 24 542 code 2022 11 16 21 06 09 986

code 2022 11 16 21 08 45 913 code 2022 11 16 21 10 56 852

Well, then we will go directly to the gaming tests and determine what impact this game has on modern computer hardware.

TEST PART
Test configuration
test stands

GIGABYTE G1 Sniper Z97

GIGABYTE GA-X99-Gaming 7 WIFI

ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

ROG Strix X570-E Gaming

MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI

MSI MPG Z590 GAMING CARBON WIFI

GIGABYTE Z690 AERO G  Air

Z690 AORUS MASTER      aorus

ROG CROSSHAIR X670E rog

multimedia equipment

Water cooling system ROG RYUJIN II 360 rog

Monitor Philips 326M6VJRMB/00

Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TX-1000

32 GB DDR4 3200 CL15 ZEN1

32 GB DDR4 3600 CL16 Kingston FURY Renegade             Kingston FURY logo

32 GB DDR4 4000 CL18 Kingston FURY Renegade             Kingston FURY logo

32 GB DDR5 5600 CL40 Kingston Fury Beast                     Kingston FURY logo

32 GB DDR5 6000@6400 CL30 Kingston FURY Renegade Kingston FURY logo

Kingston FURY Renegade PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD            Kingston FURY logo

Software configuration
Operating system Windows 10 21H2/ Windows 11(Alder Lake)
Graphics driver

Nvidia GeForce/ION Driver Release 526.98 WHQL

AMD Radeon Adrenaline Edition 22.11.1

Monitoring programs

MSI Afterburner

 
All video cards were tested at maximum graphics quality by MSI Afterburner. The purpose of the test is to determine how video cards from different manufacturers behave under the same conditions. Below is a video of the test segment:

Our video cards were tested at resolutions of 1920x1080, 2560x1600, 3840x2160 at extreme graphics quality settings.

  20221016 145524 20221016 145904 20221016 151019 20221018 120437

For testing the AM5 platform, the motherboard was used ROG CROSSHAIR X670E and water cooling system ROG RYUJIN II 360.

Motherboard ROG CROSSHAIR X670E , made in the mATX form factor, allows you to implement the capabilities of the ROG series in compact gaming systems. With a powerful power system and heatsinks, it can unlock the full potential of AMD Ryzen 7000 series processors. DIY PC enthusiasts will also appreciate support for modern components and standards, including PCIe 5.0, DDR5 memory, Wi-Fi 6E and USB4 interfaces.

Liquid cooling system ROG RYUJIN II 360 with 3,5" LCD display, built-in pump fan and three 120mm Noctua iPPC 2000 radiator fans and seventh generation Asetek pump.

GPU TEST

code 2022 11 16 22 47 24 946 code 2022 11 16 22 47 27 949

In the test of video cards, the default resolution is 1920x1080, other resolutions are added and removed manually. You can also remove and add any positions of video cards. You can also select any of our test processors from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the given video card tests (by default, the most productive solution is selected). The test is carried out on the most productive CPU in this game and is scaled to other processors, taking into account their testing on NVIDIA and AMD video cards.

If you are interested in buying a video card from our testing, you can follow the link in its name in the modular graphics and select the model you need.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 GPU Benchmark
  • DX12 Extreme
  • Screen resolutions 1 of 3

  • Hide DLSS/FSR video cards

  • Loading ...


With permission 1920x1080  an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070A minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070 A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames will be able to provide solutions Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce RTX 2070 .

With permission 2560x1440 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070A minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1080 A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames will be able to provide solutions Radeon RX 6600 XT or GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.

With permission 3840x2160 an average FPS of 25 frames was shown by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or or GeForce RTX 2060sA minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 5700 or GeForceRTX2070  A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames will be able to provide solutions Radeon RX 6800 XT or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti.

VIDEO RAM CONSUMPTION

after

Testing of the video memory consumed by the game was carried out by the program MSI Afterburner. For the indicator, the results were taken on video cards from AMD and NVIDIA at resolutions 1920x1080, 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 with different anti-aliasing settings. By default, the graph displays the most up-to-date solutions. Other graphics cards are added and removed from the chart at the reader's request.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 VRAM test
  • DX12 Extreme
  • All screen resolutions

  • Hide DLSS/FSR video cards

GEFORCE RTX 4090 24GB
15427
14663
14025
10439
10362
10589
GEFORCE RTX 2070 Super 8GB
7468
7193
7094
GEFORCE RTX 2080 Super 8GB
7528
7252
7151
13703
13043
12736
13983
13309
12996
13703
13043
12736
10687
10550
10613

GameGPU

 - 3840x2160 Mbyte
 - 2560x1440 Mbyte
 - 1920x1080 Mbyte

With permission 1920x1080 video memory consumption for video cards with 8 gigabytes 7 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 10 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 13 gigabyte with 24 gigabytes 14 gigabyte .

With permission 2560x1440 video memory consumption for video cards from 8 gigabytes to 7 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 11 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 13 gigabyte with 24 gigabytes 15 gigabyte .

With permission 3840x2160 video memory consumption for video cards from 8 gigabytes to 7 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 12 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 14gigabyte with 24 gigabytes 16 gigabyte .

CPU TEST

code 2022 11 16 22 47 24 946 code 2022 11 16 22 47 27 949

Testing was carried out at a resolution of 1920x1080. In the processor test, you can remove and add any positions of the processors. You can also select any tested video card from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the results of processor tests (the most productive solution from NVIDIA is selected by default). Testing takes place on the most productive NVIDIA and AMD video cards and scales up to lower models.

If you are interested in buying a processor from our testing, you can follow the link in its name in the modular graphics and select the model you need.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 CPU test
  • DX12 Extreme
  • All screen resolutions

  • All processors

  • Loading ...

When using video cards NVIDIA an acceptable rate of at least 25 frames per second was shown by processors Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i7 4770, and an FPS rate of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions of the level Ryzen 5 1600X or Core i7 5960x

When using video cards AMD an acceptable rate of at least 25 frames per second showed processors Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i7 4770 , and the FPS is at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide level solutions   Ryzen 5 1600 or Core i3 10100.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 Test Cores
  • DX12 Extreme
  • All screen resolutions

  • All processors

1 core
10 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
7 core
8 core
9 core
1 HT
10 HT
2 HT
3 HT
4 HT
5 HT
6 HT
7 HT
8 HT
9 HT
54
63
57
65
57
56
84
89
65
55
77
36
38
41
52
38
45
52
52
78
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
7 core
8 core
1 HT
2 HT
3 HT
4 HT
5 HT
6 HT
7 HT
8 HT
82
72
72
35
72
72
85
85
64
66
67
75
45
41
47
64
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
1 HT
2 HT
3 HT
4 HT
5 HT
6 HT
75
81
77
89
66
84
82
42
91
95
93
31
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
1 HT
2 HT
3 HT
4 HT
88
80
84
92
91
89
84
89
1 core
10 core
11 core
12 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
7 core
8 core
9 core
1 SMT
10 SMT
11 SMT
12 SMT
2 SMT
3 SMT
4 SMT
5 SMT
6 SMT
7 SMT
8 SMT
9 SMT
58
64
42
31
63
67
70
48
61
80
52
84
44
8
17
6
41
2
2
71
3
66
16
72
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
7 core
8 core
1 SMT
2 SMT
3 SMT
4 SMT
5 SMT
6 SMT
7 SMT
8 SMT
73
55
64
59
67
65
67
67
59
55
53
59
65
63
70
67
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
5 core
6 core
1 SMT
2 SMT
3 SMT
4 SMT
5 SMT
6 SMT
81
72
72
75
66
78
77
67
75
67
75
78
1 core
2 core
3 core
4 core
1 SMT
2 SMT
3 SMT
4 SMT
84
88
92
80
69
75
79
71

GameGPU

 - 1920x1080%

The game can download up to 24 threads. The game uses 16 threads as efficiently as possible.

RAM TEST

sys

The test was conducted on the base configuration Core i 9 13900K with 32 GB DDR5 6400 MHz pre-installed memory. All used RAM was taken as an indicator. The RAM test on the entire system was carried out on various video cards without running extraneous applications (browsers, etc.). In the graphics, you can add and remove any resolutions and video cards as desired.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 RAM test
  • DX12 Extreme
  • All screen resolutions

  • Hide DLSS/FSR video cards

GEFORCE RTX 4090 24GB
12023
12001
11902
12228
12355
12357
12011
11018
11335
12014
12288
12560
11890
10907
11221
11990
12263
12535
GEFORCE RTX 2070 Super 8GB
11858
12128
12397
GEFORCE RTX 2080 Super 8GB
11954
12227
12497
11978
12251
12522
12146
12132
12057
12394
12380
12303
12146
12132
12057
12106
11998
11949
12069
11675
11549
12093
11698
11572
11972
11581
11456

GameGPU

 - 3840x2160 Mbyte
 - 2560x1440 Mbyte
 - 1920x1080 Mbyte

With permission 1920x1080 RAM consumption for video cards with 8 gigabytes 12 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 12 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 12 gigabyte, with 24 gigabytes 12 gigabyte .

With permission 2560x1440 RAM consumption for video cards with 8 gigabytes 12 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 12 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 12 gigabyte with 24 gigabytes 12 gigabyte .

With permission 3840x2160 RAM consumption for video cards with 8 gigabytes 12 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 12 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 112 gigabyte with 24 gigabytes 12 gigabyte . 

 
aorus Seasonic 40 years logo nvidia
     
  Kingston FURY logo artline logo black 200x100  Asus Rog 
  
Тeating  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 76% [18 Votes] Graphics  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 33% [21 Votes] Optimization  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 36% [23 Votes]

 

For those who want to instantly receive a message about the release of the review, without being tormented by thoughts, well, when it already appears on the site, we immediately connect to our Telegram!!!

telegram icon png 3

 

People in this conversation

Comments (16)

This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Sucks, you need to change your dirty percent. Can't output 3080ti at 144hz

The
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

On my 3300x and px6600, the video card is often loaded by 70-80%, while the processor is loaded by 50-60%. It seems that the game simply does not use 8 threads, but sits only on 4x.

Todd
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

So yes, from the tests of that percentage, according to the tests, the maximum reveals the vidyuhu 6600 by 90%, what's the problem?

Undertaker
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

I found that the game mainly uses 5 CPU threads out of 8. Also, the lower the graphics settings, the worse and more unstable the frame rate, the friezes appear more often, so I play on ultra settings with FPS close to those shown in the tests here on mine VC. On reddit they write about the same problems, in particular, even on zen2 processors with 8/16. Obviously, the pogromists recruited by quotas simply gave up on optimizing processors older than 21 years old.

Todd
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

put a lock on fps and you will be happy. so that the game does not give out constantly jumping 90-150 fps and that the fps is stable. and it will be much better in the picture and the friezes will be many times less.

VadimRB
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

I tried that, but for some reason it doesn't work. It is the ultra graphics settings that make the gameplay more comfortable.

Todd
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Devil in me is out. Also, RT was screwed to it. Will you test?

John 23
svl admin    John 23
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

we'll start when I still don't know how the light will be

svl
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Put 4K ultra and DLSS quality.
160fps at 4K 144Hz monica..........just bombing
I was so not happy with the purchase of a new card from the 1000th series

Andrei
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Andrei

I was so not happy with the purchase of a new card from the 1000th series

160fps at 4K 144Hz monitor.

Wasn't it easier to run at 1440p right away? So at least without loops it would have come out

RadeoForce
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

huang said that 4k + dlss is better than honest 1440r - don't argue

jt38
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Here, someone else really thinks that dlss quality 4k is worse than 1440p

Timati
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

Yes, here people have never seen a 4K 144Hz panel for 100k.
But the experts are still the same.
And the fact that 4K, even with dlss, the balance will bend over the picture 1440r without dlss, it’s better for them not to know, otherwise G will be a kapets.

Andrei
This comment was made by the moderator on the site

I didn’t understand the essence of your discussion, 2k is 4k + dlss, that is, how can the same thing be worse than itself?

But about native 4k, is it better for dlss 4k, that's the question

Undertaker
There are no comments left here yet.